![]() |
Why are most Europeans
opposed to GMOs?
|
| Acronyms and abbreviations: | ATTAC:
Association for the Taxation of Financial Transactions for the
Aid of Citizens; BSE: Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy; DNK/DK: Don't know (in a survey); EC: European Commission; EU: European Union; EU 15: The 15 Member States of the European Union in 2001: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Ireland, Italy, Luxemburg, Portugal, Spain, Sweden, the Netherlands, United Kingdom; Germany (new Länder): former East Germany - Germany (former Länder): former West Germany; GM: Genetically Modified; IFIC: International Food Information Council Foundation (USA); IFOP: Institut français de l'opinion publique (French Institute of Public Opinion, a market research and opinion surveys Institute); IPSOS: A polling institute; LETS: Local Exchange trading Systems; NGO: Non Governmental Organization. |
| Abstract | Full Text |
A strong movement of opposition to GMOs developed in the late 1990s in many countries, especially in Europe, although these technologies were presented from the outset as highly promising and their advantages were often highlighted. How can this rejection be explained? The aim of this paper is to answer that question through the case of France, which is fairly representative in this respect of various European countries, even if the opposition movement is here particularly strong. One examines various factors, actors and processes that have led to such strong opposition to GMOs that at this stage their development in Europe has almost totally been halted. In the first part of the article we recall the results of several recent surveys, showing the level of acceptance or refusal of genetic engineering in several countries. We then examine important factors of rejection: the focus on potential risks of GMOs and the extensive publicity given to them, coupled with the inadequacy of answers to these diverse criticisms, and a drawing up of an unfavorable risk-benefit balance. Lastly, we point out that various fears and objections to the evolution of agriculture and to the functioning of society (i.e. limited trust in institutions and firms) appear to be crystallized around GMOs.
|
Home | Mail to Editor | Search | Archive | ||