Plant Biotechnology Molecular Biology and Genetics
EJB Electronic Journal of Biotechnology ISSN: 0717-3458
© 1998 by Universidad Católica de Valparaíso -- Chile

The agrobacterium tumefaciens gene transfer to plant cell

Gustavo A. de la Riva*
Laboratory of Environmental Biotechnology. Plant Division. Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIGB). P.O.Box 6162, 10600 Havana, Cuba
Fax: (53-7) 218070, (53-7) 336008

Joel González-Cabrera
Laboratory of Environmental Biotechnology. Plant Division. Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIGB). P.O.Box 6162, 10600 Havana, Cuba
Fax: (53-7) 218070, (53-7) 336008

Roberto Vázquez-Padrón
Laboratory of Environmental Biotechnology. Plant Division. Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIGB). P.O.Box 6162, 10600 Havana, Cuba
Fax: (53-7) 218070, (53-7) 336008

Camilo Ayra-Pardo
Laboratory of Environmental Biotechnology. Plant Division. Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology (CIGB). P.O.Box 6162, 10600 Havana, Cuba
Fax: (53-7) 218070, (53-7) 336008

*Corresponding author

Running title: Agrobacterium-mediated transformation

Key words: Agrobacterium tumefaciens, T-DNA, plant transformation

BIP Article

The update information of mechanisms of T-DNA transfer to plant cells by Agrobacterium tumefaciens is provided. Characterisation of such mechanisms shows multiple similarities with the bacterial conjugation allowing us to consider the evolutive relation between both genetic transfer processes. The general assessments of this process and its implication for plant genetic engineering are discussed with an emphasis in the application of this methodology to monocotyledonous plants.

Plant transformation mediated by the soil plant pathogen Agrobacterium tumefaciens has become the most used method for plant transformation. A. tumefaciens naturally infects the wound sites in dicotyledonous plant causing the formation of the crown gall tumours. Since the discovery of the bacterial origin of this neoplastic diseases (Smith and Townsend, 1907) a large number of researches have focused on the study of this process, firstly with the hope to understand the mechanisms of oncogenesis in general and applied it to study of cancer disease in animals and humans. Later this hypothesis was discarded and the interest on crown gall disease largely decreased until it was evident that A. tumefaciens is capable to transfer a particular DNA segment (T-DNA) of the tumour-inducing (Ti) plasmid into the nucleus of infected cells where it is subsequently stable integrated into the host genome and transcribed, causing the crown gall disease (Nester et al., 1984; Binns and Thomashaw, 1988). The T-DNA contains two types of genes: the oncogenic genes, encoding for enzymes involved in the synthesis of auxins and cytokinins and responsible for tumour formation; and the genes encoding for the synthesis of opines, a product resulted from condensation between amino acids and sugars, which are produced and excreted by the crown gall cells and consume by A. tumefaciens as carbon and nitrogen sources. Outside the T-DNA, are located the genes for the opine catabolism, the genes involved in the process of T-DNA transfer from the bacterium to the plant cell and for the bacterium-bacterium plasmid conjugative transfer genes (Hooykaas and Schilperoort, 1992; Zupan and Zambrysky, 1995).

Virulent strains of A. tumefaciens and A. rhizogenes contain a large megaplasmid (more than 200 kb) which play a key role in tumour induction and for this reason it was named Ti plasmid, or Ri in the case of A. rhizogenes. The T-DNA fragment is flanked by 25-bp direct repeats, which act as a cis element signal for the transfer apparatus. The transfer is mediated by the co-operative action of proteins encoded by genes determined in the Ti plasmid virulence region (vir genes) and in the bacterial chromosome. The 30 kb virulence (vir) region is a regulon organised in six operons that are essential for the T-DNA transfer (virA, virB, virD, and virG) or for the increasing of transfer efficiency (virC and virE) (Hooykaas and Schilperoort, 1992; Zupan and Zambryski, 1995, Jeon et al., 1998). Different chromosomal-determined genetic elements have shown their functional role in the attachment of A. tumefaciens to the plant cell and bacterial colonisation. The loci chvA and chvB, involved in the synthesis and excretion of the b -1,2 glucan (Cangelosi et al., 1989); the chvE required for the sugar enhancement of vir genes induction and bacterial chemotaxis (Ankenbauer et al., 1990, Cangelosi et al., 1990, 1991); the cel locus, responsible for the synthesis of cellulose fibrils (Matthysse 1983); the pscA (exoC) locus, playing its role in the synthesis of both cyclic glucan and acid succinoglycan (Cangelosi et at., 1987, 1991); and the att locus, which is involved in the cell surface proteins (Matthysse, 1987).

The initial results of the studies on T-DNA transfer process to plant cells demonstrate three important facts for the practical use of this process in plants transformation. Firstly, the tumour formation is a transformation process of plant cells resulted from transfer and integration of T-DNA and the subsequent expression of T-DNA genes. Secondly, the T-DNA genes are transcribed only in plant cells and do not play any role during the transfer process. Thirdly, any foreign DNA placed between the T-DNA borders can be transferred to plant cell, no matter where it comes from. These well-established facts, allowed the construction of the first vector and bacterial strain systems for plant transformation (for review Hooykaas and Schilperoort, 1992; Deblaere et al., 1985; Hamilton, 1998; Torisky et al., 1998).

Agrobacterium tumefaciens T-DNA transfer process

The process of gene transfer from Agrobacterium tumefaciens to plant cells implies several essential steps: (1) bacterial colonisation (2) induction of bacterial virulence system, (3) Generation of T-DNA transfer complex (4) T-DNA transfer and (5) integration of T-DNA into plant genome. Supported by the most recent experimental data and accepted hypothesis on T-DNA transfer we presented a hypothetical model depicting the most important stages of this process (Figure 1).

Bacterial colonisation

Bacterial colonisation is an essential and the earliest step in tumour induction and it takes place when A. tumefaciens is attached to the plant cell surfac (Matthysse , 1986). Mutagenesis studies show that non-attaching mutants loss the tumour-inducing capacity (Cangelosi et al., 1987, Douglas et al., 1982, Thomashow et al., 1987, Bradley et al., 1997). The polysaccharides of the A. tumefaciens (lipopolysaccharides (LPS), and capsular polysacharides (K-antigens)) are proposed to play an important role in the colonising process (Whatley and Spiess, 1977). The LPS are integral part of outer membrane and capsular polysaccharides (K-antigens), lacking of lipid anchor, have strong anionic nature. There are evidences that capsular polysaccharides may play specific role during the interaction with the host plant (Bradley et al., 1997).

The chromosomal 20kb att locus contains the genes required for successful bacterium attachment to the plant cell. This locus has been extensively studied (Ames et al., 1990; Higgings et al., 1990,Matthysse et al. 1996). Insertions in the left 10 kb side of this region produce avirulent mutants that could restore its attachment capacity if the culture medium is previously conditioned by the incubation of wild-type virulent bacterium with plant cells. In contrast, mutational insertion in the 10 kb right side of the att locus results in the irreversible loss of attachment capacity, which can not be restored by conditioned medium (Bradley, 1997). These results suggest that genes, placed at att left side, are involved in molecular signalling events, while the right side genes are likely to be responsible for the synthesis of fundamental components.

Induction of bacterial virulence system

The T-DNA transfer is mediated by products encoded by the 30-40 kb vir region of the Ti plasmid. This region is composed by at least six essential operons (vir A, vir B, vir C, vir D, vir E, virG ) and two non-essential (virF, virH). The number of genes per operon differs, virA, virG and virF have only one gene; virE, virC, virH have two genes while virD and virB have four and eleven genes respectively. The only constitutive expressed operons are virA and virG, coding for a two-component (VirA-VirG) system activating the transcription of the other vir genes, and has structural and functional similarities to other already described for other cellular mechanisms (Nixon, 1986, Iuchi, 1993).

VirA is a transmembrane dimeric sensor protein that detects signal molecules, released from wounded plants (Pan et al., 1993). The signals for VirA activation include acidic pH, phenolic compounds, such as acetosyringone (Winans et al., 1992), and certain class of monosaccharides which acts sinergically with phelolic compounds (Ankenbauer et al., 1990; Cangelosi et al., 1990; Shimoda et al., 1990a, 1990b; Doty et al., 1996). VirA protein can be structurally defined into three domains: the periplasmic or input domain and two transmembrane domains (TM1 and TM2). The TM1 and TM2 domains act as a transmitter (signaling) and receiver (sensor) (Parkinson, 1993). The periplasmic domain is important for monosaccharide detection (Chang and Winans, 1992). Within the periplasmic domain, adjacent to the TM2 domain is an amphipatic helix, with strong hydrophilic and hydrophobic region (Heath et al., 1995). This structure is characteristic for other transmembrane sensor proteins and folds the protein to be simultaneously aligned with the inner membrane and anchored in the membrane (Seligman and Manoil, 1994). The TM2 is the kinase domain and plays a crucial role in the activation of VirA, phosphorilating itself on a conserved His-474 residue (Huang et al., 1990; Jin et al., 1990a, 1990b) in response to signalling molecules from wounded plant sites. Monosaccharide detection by VirA is important amplification system to respond to low levels of phenolic compounds. The induction of this system is only possible through the periplasmic sugar (glucose/galactose) binding protein ChvE (Ankenbauer and Nester, 1990; Cangelosi et al., 1990), which interacts with VirA (Shimoda et al., 1990a, 1990b, Turk et al., 1993; Chang and Winans, 1992). Recent studies for determination of VirA regions, important for its sensing activity suggested the position, which may be involved on TM1-TM2 interaction. This interaction causes the exposure of the amphipathic helix to small phenolic compounds and suggests a putative model for the VirA-ChvE interaction (Doty et al., 1996).

Activated VirA has the capacity to transfer its phosphate to a conserved aspartate residue of the cytoplasmic DNA binding protein VirG (Jin et al., 1990; Pan et al., 1993). VirG functions as transcriptional factor regulating the expression of vir genes when it is phosphorilated by VirA (Jin et al., 1990a, 1990b). The C-terminal region is responsible for the DNA binding activity, while the N-terminal is the phosphorilation domain and shows homology with the VirA receiver (sensor) domain.

The activation of vir system also depends on external factors like temperature and pH. At temperatures greater than 32°C the vir genes are not expressed because of a conformational change in the folding of VirA induce the inactivation of its properties (Jin et al., 1993). The effect of temperature on VirA is suppressed by a mutant form of VirG (VirGc), which activates the constitutive expression of the vir genes. However, this mutant can not confer the virulence capacity at that temperature to Agrobacterium, probably because the folding of other proteins actively participate in the T-DNA transfer process are also affected at high temperature (Fullner et al., 1996).

Generation of T-DNA transfer complex

The activation of vir genes carries out the generation of single-stranded (ss) molecules representing the copy of the bottom T-DNA strand. Any DNA placed between T-DNA borders will be transferred to the plant cell, as single strand DNA, and integrated into plant genome. These are the only cis acting elements of the T-DNA transfer system. The proteins VirD1 and VirD2 play the key role in this step are, recognising the T-DNA border sequences and nicking (endonuclease activity) the bottom strand at each border. The nick sites are assumed as the initiation and termination sites for T-strand recovery. After endonucleotidic cleavage VirD2 remains covalently attached to the 5'-end of the ss-T-strand. This association prevents the exonucleolitic attack to the 5'-end of the ss-T-strand (Dürrenberger et al., 1989) and distinguishes the 5'-end as the leading end of the T-DNA transfer complex. VirD1 interacts with the region where the ss-T-strand will be originated. Experiments "in vitro" experiments evidenced that for cleavage of supercoiled stranded substrate by VirD2 is essential the presence of VirD1 (Zupan and Zambryski, 1995; Christie et al., 1997). The simultaneous restoration of the excised ss-T-strand is evolutionarily related to other bacterial conjugative DNA transfer processes, which include the generation of the single strand DNA (Zupan and Zambryski, 1995; Christie, 1997; Lessl et al., 1994).

Extensive mutation or deletion of the right T-DNA border is followed by almost completely loss of T-DNA transfer capacity, while at the left border resulted in lower transfer efficiency (Hille et al., 1983). This fact indicates that T-strand synthesis is in 5' to 3' direction, and it is initiated at the right border and that the termination process take place even when the left border is mutated or completely absent, although at lower efficiency (Filichkin and Gelvin, 1993). The presence of an enhancer or "overdrive" sequence next to the right border (Peralta and Ream, 1985), which specifically recognised by VirC1 protein (Toro et al., 1989) could make the difference between both T-DNA borders (van Haaren at al., 1987; Rogowsky et al., 1990).

Two models for the translocation of T-DNA-complex

The transferring vehicle to the plant nucleus is a ssT-DNA-protein complex. According to the most accepted model, the ssT-DNA-VirD2 complex is coated by the 69 kDa VirE2 protein, a single strand DNA binding protein. This co-operative association prevents the attack of nucleases and, in addition, extends the ssT-DNA strand reducing the complex diameter to approximately 2 nm, making easier the translocation through membrane channels. However, that association does not stabilises T-DNA complex inside Agrobacterium (Zupan et al., 1996). VirE2 contains two plant nuclear location signals (NLS) and VirD2 one (Bravo Angel et al, 1998). This fact indicates that both proteins are presumably to play important role once the complex is in the plant cell mediating the complex uptake to the nucleus (Herrera-Estrella et al., 1990; Shurvinton et al., 1992; Rossi et al., 1993, Tinland et al., 1995, Zupan et al., 1996).

VirE1 is essential for the export of VirE2 to the plant cell (Binns et al., 1995). Bacterial strains mutated in virE1, cannot export VirE2 and resulted in its accumulation inside the bacterium. Such mutants can be complemented if coinfecting with strain that can export VirE2, indicating that this protein can be exported independently and that for transmission event does not necessary the transfer of VirE2 as part of the ss-T-DNA complex (Sundberg et al., 1996) and that is possible the transfer of naked T-DNA to the plant cell (Binns et al., 1995; Sundberg et al., 1996).

From these experimental evidences an alternative model was brought. This model proposes that the transfer complex is a single-strand DNA covalently bound at its 5'-end with VirD2, but uncoated by VirE2. The independent export of VirE2 to plant cell is presented as natural process, and once the naked ssT-DNA-VirD2 complex is inside the plant cell, it is coated by VirE2 (Binns et al., 1995; Lessl et al., 1992).

Previous researches described the role of 9.5 kb virB operon in the generation of a suitable cell surface structure for the ssT-DNA complex transfer from bacterium to plant (Finberg et al., 1995; Stephens et al., 1995; Zhou and Christie, 1997; Dang and Christie, 1997; Rashkova et al., 1997, Fernandez et al., 1996; Beaupré et al., 1997). The VirD4 protein is also required for the ss-T-DNA transport. The function of VirD4 is the ATP-dependent linkage of protein complex necessary for T-DNA translocation (Firth et al., 1996).

VirB are proteins that present the hydrophathy characteristics similar others membrane-associated proteins (Kuldau et al., 1990; Shirasu et al., 1990, 1994; Thompson et al., 1988; Ward et al., 1988). VirD4 protein is a transmembrane protein but predominantly located at the cytoplasmatic side of the cytoplasmic membrane (Okamoto et al., 1991). Comparative studies showed highly degree of homology between the virB operon and transfer regions of broad host range (BHR) plasmid in genetic organisation, nucleotide sequence and protein function (Pohlman et al., 1994; Lessl et al., 1992). Both systems delivery non-self transmissible DNA-protein complex to recipient host cell. In addition, they have the capacity to DNA interkingdom delivery (Heinemann and Sprague, 1989; Bundock et al., 1995; Piers et al., 1996) suggesting that T-DNA transfer apparatus and conjugation systems are related and probably evolved from a common ancestral (Christie et al., 1997; Oger et al., 1998).

The majority of VirB proteins are assembled as a membrane-spanning protein channel involved both membranes (Shirasu and Kado, 1993a, 1993b; Shirasu et al., 1994; Stephens et al., 1995; Das and Xie, 1998). Except for VirB11, they have multiple periplasmic domains (Christie, 1997). VirB1 is the only member of VirB proteins found in the extracellular milieu (Baron et al., 1997) although it is possible that some of the other VirB proteins may be redistributed during the process of biogenesis and functioning of the transcellular conjugal channel (Christie, 1997). That could be the case of the VirB2, which is translated as a 12 kDa proprotein, and later is later proteolically processed to its mature 7 kDa functional form (Jones et al., 1996).

VirB4 and VirB11 are hydrophilic ATPases necessary for active DNA transfer. Vir B11 lacks continuous sequence of hydrophobic residues, motivating of periplasmic domains (Rashkova et al., 1997). These characteristics are atypical for this type of protein and evidence the possible dinamic co-existence of different conformational forms "in vivo". VirB4 tightly associates with the cytoplasmic membrane (Dang and Christie, 1997). It contains two putative extracellular domains conferring transmembrane topology to this protein, which is presumed to allow the ATP-dependent conformational change in the conjugation channel. Probably, the functional forms of VirB4 and VirB11 are homo- and heterodimmers (Dang and Christie, 1997). The VirB7-VirB9 heterodimmer is assumed to stabilises other Vir proteins during assembly of functional transmembrane channel (Fernandez et al., 1996; Spudich et al., 1996).

Recent studies identified some of the initial steps of biogenesis of ssT-DNA complex apparatus. Firstly, VirB7 and VirB9 monomers are exported to the membrane and processed. They interact each other to form covalently cross-linked homo- and heterodimmers. Although it is widely assumed the role of both types of dimmers in the biogenesis of the transfer apparatus, it is likely that only heterodimmers are the essential ones (Fernández et al., 1996; Spudich et al., 1996). Subsequently the VirB7-VirB9 heterodimmer is sorted to the outer membrane. The sorting mechanism has not been elucidated (Christie, 1997) the next step implies the interaction with the other Vir proteins for assembling the transfer channel with the contribution of the transglycosidase (Berger and Christie, 1993, 1994).

Two accessory vir operons, present in the octopine Ti-plasmid are virF and virH. The virF operon encoding for a 23-kDa protein that functions once the T-DNA complex is inside the plant cells via the conjugal channel or independently, as it was assumed for VirE2 export. The role of VirF is seems to be related with the nuclear targeting of the ssT-DNA complex but its contribution is less important than in the case of VirF (Hooykass and Schilperoort, 1992). The virH operon consists in two genes that code for VirH1 and VirH2 proteins. These Vir proteins are no essential but could enhance the transfer efficiency, detoxifying certain plant compounds that can affect the growth of bacterial (Kanemoto et al., 1989). If that is the function of VirH proteins, they play a role in the host range specificity of bacterial strain for different plant species.

Integration of T-DNA into plant genome.

Inside the plant cell, the ssT-DNA complex is targeted to the nucleus crossing the nuclear membrane. Two Vir proteins have been found to be important in this step: VirD2 and VirE2, which are the most important; and probably VirF, which has minor contribution to this process (Hooykaas and Schilperoort, 1992). The two NLS of VirE2 have been considered important for the continuos nuclear import of ss-T-DNA complex, probably by keeping both sides of nuclear pore simultaneously open. The nuclear import is probably also mediated by specific NLS-binding proteins, which are present in plant cytoplasm.

The final step of T-DNA transfer is its integration into plant genome. It is considered that the integration occurs by illegitimate recombination (Gheysen et al., 1991, Lehman et al., 1994; Puchta, 1998). According to this model, paring of a few bases provides just a minimum specificity for the recombination process by positioning VirD2 for the ligation. The 3´-end or adjacent sequences of T-DNA find some low homologies with plant DNA resulting in the first contact (synapses) between the T-strand and plant DNA forms a gap in 3'-5' strand of plant DNA. Displaced plant DNA is subsequently cut at the 3'-end position of the gap by endonucleases, and the first nucleotide of the 5' attached to VirD2 pairs with a nucleotide in the top (5'-3') plant DNA strand. The 3' overhanging part of T-DNA together with displaced plant DNA are digested away, either by endonucleases or by 3'-5' exonucleases. Them, the 5' attached to VirD2 end and other 3'-end of T-strand (paired with plant DNA during since the first step of integration process) joins the nicks in the bottom plant DNA strand. Once the introduction of T-strand in the 3'-5' strand of the plant DNA is completed, a torsion followed by a nick into opposite plant DNA strand is produced. This situation activates the repair mechanism of the plant cell and the complementary strand is synthesised using the early inserted T-DNA strand as a template (Tinland et al., 1995).

VirD2 has an active role in the precise integration on T-strand in the plant chromosome. The release of VirD2 protein may provide the energy containing in its phosphodiester bond, at the Tyr29 residue, with the first nucleotide of T-strand, providing the 5'-end of the T-strand for ligation to the plant DNA. This phosphodiester bound can serve as electrophilic substrate for nucleophilic 3'-OH from nicked plant DNA. (Jayaram, 1994) When the mutant VirD2 protein is transferred attached to the T-strand, the integration process take place with the loss of nucleotides at the 5'-end of the T-strand (Tinland et al., 1995).

Plant transformation mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens

The first plant transformed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens was tobacco (Herrera-Estrella, 1983). Since that crucial moment in the development of plant science, a great progress in understanding the Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer to plant cells has been archived. However, Agrobacterium tumefaciens naturally infects only dicotyledonous plants and many economically important plants, including the cereals, remained accessible for genetic manipulation during long time. For these cases alternative direct transformation methods have been developed (Shillito et al, 1985; Potrykus, 1991, Uchimiya et al., 1986, de la Pena et al., 1987, Fromm et al., 1985, 1986; Lörz et al., 1985; Arencibia 1995, Sanford, 1988). However Agrobacterium-mediated transformation have remarkable advantages over direct transformation methods in reducing the copy number of the transgene, potentially leading to fewer problems with transgene cosuppresion and instability (Koncz et al., 1994, Hansen et al., 1997). In addition, It is a single-cell transformation system and avoids the obtainment of mosaic plants, which are more frequent when direct transformation is used (Enríquez-Obregón et al 1997, 1998).

The monocots have been considered to be outside the Agrobacterium host range and other gene-transfer methods were developed for these plants. To develop this methodologies for a monocot plant it is important to take in consideration the critical aspects in the Agrobacterium tumefaciens-plant interaction, the cellular and tissue culture methodologies developed for that specie. The suitable genetic materials (bacterial strains, binary vectors, reporter and marker genes, promoters) and molecular biology techniques available in the laboratory, are necessary for selection of DNA to be introduce. This DNA must be expressible in plant making possible the identification of transformed plants in selectable medium and using molecular biology techniques test and characterise the transformation events (for review Birch, 1997).

Transformation is currently used for genetic manipulation of more than 120 species of at least 35 families, including the most major economic crops, vegetables, ornamental, medicinal, fruit, tree and pasture plants (Birch, 1997), using Agrobacterium-mediated or direct transformation methods. The idea, that some species can not accept the integration of foreign DNA in its genome and lack the capacity to be transformed is unacceptable under the increasing number species that have been transformed.

The optimisation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens-plant interaction is probably the most important aspect to be considered. It includes the integrity of bacterial strain its correct manipulation as warranty of the virulence machine integrity and the study of reaction in wounded plant tissue, which may develop necrotic process in the wounded tissue or affect the interaction and release compounds inducers or repressors of Agrobacterium virulence system. The type of explant is also important fact and it must be suitable for regeneration allowing the recovering of whole transgenic plants. The establishment of method for efficient regeneration for one particular species is crucial for its transformation.

The mentioned aspects are important to establish transformation procedure for any plant but particularly for those species categorised as recalcitrant. In this category have been included cereals, legumes and woody plants, which are very difficult to transform or remain untransformed. Many species originally considered in this category has been transformed in recent years. One of these species, sugarcane, has been transformed in our laboratory (Figure 2) ( Arencibia et al., 1998).

Concluding Remarks

Agrobacterium tumefaciens is more than the causative agent of crown gall disease affecting dicotyledonous plants. It is also firstly the natural instance for the introduction of foreign gene in plants allowing its genetic manipulation. Similarities have been found between T-DNA and conjugal transfer systems are evolutionally related and apparently evolved from a common ancestral.

Although the gene transfer mechanisms remain largely unknown, great progress has been obtained in practical implementation of transformation protocols for both dicotyledonous and monocotyledonous plants. Particularly important is the extension of this single-cell transformation methodology to monocotyledonous plants. This advance has biological and practical implications. Firstly, because of advances of A. tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer over the direct transformation methods, which where the only way for genetic manipulation of economically important crops as cereals and legumes. Second, it has been demonstrated that T-DNA is transferred to dicot and monocot plants by an identical molecular mechanism. This confirmation implies that any plant can potentially be transformed by this method if suitable transformation protocol is established.

The Agrobacterium-mediated transformation protocols differ from one plant specie to other and, within species, from one cultivar to other. In consequence, the optimisation of Agrobacterium-mediated transformation methodologies requires the considered of several factors that can be determined in the successful transformation of one species. Firstly, the optimisation of Agrobacterium-plant interaction on competent cells from different regenerable tissues. Second, the development of suitable method for regeneration from transformed cells.

Undoubtedly, the development of transformation procedures based on A. tumefaciens-mediated gene transfer for new economically important species are advisable and the results obtained in last years evidence a promising future.


Ames G. F-L., C.S. Mimura and Shyamala V. (1990). Bacterial periplasmic permeases belong to a family of transport proteins operating from Escherichia coli to human: traffic ATPases. FEMs Microbiological Review 75:429-446.

Ankenbauer, R.G. and Nester E.W. (1990). Sugar-mediated induction of Agrobacterium tumefaciens virulence genes: structural specificity and activities of monosaccharides. Journal of Bacteriology 172:6442-6446.

Arencibia A.D., Carmona E.R., Tellez P., Chan M.T. , Yu S.M., Trujillo L.E. and Oramas P. (1998). An efficient protocol for sugarcane (Saccharum spp. L.) transformation mediated by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Transgenic Research 7:1-10.

Arencibia, A, P. Molina, De la Riva G. and Selman-Housein G. (1995). Production of transgenic sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) plants by intact cell electroporation. Plant Cell Reports 14:305-309.

Baron C., Llosa M., Zhou S. and Zambryski P.C. (1997). VirB1, a component of the T-complex transfer machinery of Agrobacterium tumefaciens is processed to a C-terminal secreted product VirB1*. Journal of Bacteriology 179:1203-1210.

Beaupre, CE, Bohne J., Dale E.M., and Binns A.N. (1997). Interactions between VirB9 and VirB10 proteins involved in the movement of DNA from Agrobacterium tumefaciens into plant cells. Journal of Bacteriology 179:78-89.

Berger B.R. and Christie P.J. (1993). The Agrobacterium tumefaciens virB4 gene product is an essential virulence protein requiring an intact nucleoside triphosphate-binding domain. Journal of Bacteriology 175: 1723-1734.

Berger, B.R. and Christie P.J. (1994). Genetic complementation analysis of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens virB operon: virB2 through virB11 are essential virulence genes. Journal of Bacteriology 176:3646-3660.

Binns A.N. and Thomashow M.F. (1988). Cell biology of Agrobacterium infection and transformation of plants. Annual Review of Microbiology 42:575-606.

Binns A.N., Beaupre C.E.and Dale E.M. (1995). Inhibition of VirB-mediated transfer of diverse substrate from Agrobacterium tumefaciens by the IncQ plasmid RSF1010. Journal of Bacteriology 177:4890-4899.

Birch, R.G. (1997). Plant transformation: Problems and strategies for practical application. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 48:297-326.

Bradley L.R., Kim J.S. and Matthysse A.G. (1997). Attachment of Agrobacterium tumefaciens to Carrot Cells and Arabidopsis wound sites is correlated with the presence of a cell-associated, acidic polysaccharide. Journal of Bacteriology 179:5372-5379.

Bravo Angel A.M, Hohn B. and Tinland B. (1998). The omega sequence of VirD2 is important but not essential for efficient transfer of the T-DNA by Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Molecular Plant-Microbe Interactions 11:57-63.

Bundock P., den Dulk-Ras A., Beijerbergen A. and Hooykaas P.J.J. (1995). Trans-kingdon T-DNA transfer from Agrobacterium tumefaciens to Saccharomyces cerevisiae. EMBO Journal 14:3206-3214.

Cangelosi G.A., Hung L., Puvanesarajah V., Stacey G., Ozga D.A., Leigh J.A. and Nester E.W. (1987). Common loci for Agrobacterium tumefaciens and Rhizobium meliloti exopolysaccharide synthesis and their role in plant interaction. Journal of Bacteriology 169:2086-2091.

Cangelosi G.A., Best E.A., Martinetti C. and Nester E.W. (1991). Genetic analysis of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Methods in Enzymology 145:177-181.

Cangelosi G.A. , Martinetti G., Leigh J.A., Lee C.C., Theines C. and Nester E.W. (1989). Role of Agrobacterium tumefaciens chvA protein in export of b -1,2 glucan. Journal of Bacteriology 171:1609-1615.

Cangelosi G.A., Ankenbauer R.G. and Nester E.W. (1990). Sugars induce the Agrobacterium virulence genes through a periplasmic binding protein and a transmembrane signal protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 87:6708-6712.

Chang C.H. and Winans S.C. (1992). Functional roles assigned to the periplasmic, linker and receiver domains of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirA protein. Journal of Bacteriology 174:7033-7039.

Christie P.J. (1997). Agrobacterium tumefaciens T-complex transport apparatus: a paradigm for a new family of multifunctional transporters in Eubacteria. Journal of Bacteriology 179:3085-3094.

Dang T.A.T. and Christie P.J. (1997). The VirB4 ATPase of Agrobacterium tumefaciens is a cytoplasmic membrane protein exposed at the periplasmic surface. Journal of Bacteriology 179:453-462.

Das A. and Xie Y.H. (1998). Construction of transposon Tn3phoA: its application in defining the membrane topology of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens DNA transfer proteins. Molecular Microbiology 27:405-414.

De la Pena A., Lörz H. and Schell J. (1987). Transgenic rye plants obtained by injecting DNA into young floral tillers. Nature 325:274-276.

Deblaere R., Bytebier B., De Greve H., Deboeck F., Schell J., Van Montagu M. and Leemans J. (1985). Efficient octopine Ti plasmid-derived vectors for Agrobacterium-mediated gene transfer to plants. Nucleic Acid Research 13:4777-4788.

Doty S.L., Yu N.C., Lundin J.I., Heath J.D. and Nester E.W. (1996). Mutational analysis of the input domain of the VirA protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Journal of Bacteriology 178:961-970.

Douglas C.J., Halperin W. and Nester E.W. (1982). Agrobacterium tumefaciens mutants affected in attachment to plant cell. Journal of Bacteriology 152:1265-1275.

Dürrenberger F., Crameri A., Hohn B. and Koukolikova-Nicola Z. (1989). Covalently bound VirD2 protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens protects the T-DNA from exonucleolytic degradation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 86:9154-9158.

Enríquez-Obregón G.A., Vázquez-Padrón R.I., Prieto-Sansonov D.L., De la Riva G.A., Selman-Housein G. (1998). Herbicide resistant sugarcane (Saccharum officinarum L.) plants by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation. Planta 206:20-27.

Enríquez-Obregón G.A., Vázquez-Padrón R.I., Prieto-Samsónov D.L., Pérez M. and Selman-Housein G. (1997). Genetic transformation of sugarcane by Agrobacterium tumefaciens using antioxidants compounds. Biotecnología Aplicada 14:169-174.

Fernández D., Spudich G.M., Zhou X.R., Berger B.R. and Christie P.J. (1996). Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB7 lipoprotein is required for stabilisation of VirB proteins during assembly of the T-complex transport apparatus. Journal of Bacteriology 178:3168-3176.

Filichkin S.A. and Gelvin S.B. (1993). Formation of a putative relaxation intermediate during T-DNA processing directed by Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirD1/D2 endonuclease. Molecular Microbiology 8:915-926.

Finberg K.E., Muth T.R., Young S.P., Maken J.B., Heitritter S.M., Binns A.N. and Banta L.M. (1995). Interactions of VirB9, -10 and -11 with the membrane fraction of Agrobacterium tumefaciens: solubility studies provide evidence of tight associations. Journal of Bacteriology 177:4881-4889.

Firth N., Ippen-Ihler K. and Skurray R.A. (1996). Structure and function of the F factor and mechanism of conjugation, p. 2377-2401. In: Neidhardt F.C., Curtis III R., Ingraham J.L., Lin E.C.C., Low K.B., Magasanik B., Reznikoff W.S., Riley M., Schaechter M. and Umbarger H.C. (ed.), Escherichia coli and Salmonella: cellular and molecular biology 2nd edition. American Society for Microbiology. Washington DC.

Fromm M, Taylor L. and Walbot V. (1985). Expression of genes transferred into monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plant cells by electroporation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 82:5824-5828.

Fromm M, Taylor L.and Walbot V. (1986). Stable transformation of maize after gene transfer by electroporation. Nature 319:791-793.

Fullner K.J., Lara J.C. and Nester E.W. (1996). Pilus assembly by Agrobacterium T-DNA transfer genes. Science 273:1107-1109.

Gheysen G., Villarroel R. and Van Montagu M. (1989). Illegitimate recombination in plants: a model for T-DNA integration. Genes Development 5:287-297.

Hamilton, C.M. (1997) A binary-BAC system for plant transformation with high molecular weight DNA. Gene 200:107-116.

Hansen G., Shillito R.D. and Chilton M.D. (1997). T-strand integration in maize protoplasts after codelivery of a T-DNA substrate and virulence genes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of USA 94:11726-11730.

Heath J.D., Charles T.C. and Nester E.W. (1995). Ti plasmid and chromosonally encoded two-component systems important in plant cell transformation by Agrobacterium tumefaciens, p. 367-385. In: Hoch J.A. and Silhavy T.J. (ed.), Two-component signal transduction. ASM Press, Washington DC.

Heinemann J.A. and Sprague G.F. (1989). Bacterial conjugative plasmids mobilise DNA transfer between bacteria and yeast. Nature 340:205-209.

Herrera-Estrella, A, M Van Montagu and K Wang (1990). A bacterial peptide acting as a plant nuclear targeting signal: the amino-terminal portion of Agrobacterium VirD2 protein directs the b -galactosidase fusion protein into tobacco nuclei. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 87:9534-9537.

Herrera-Estrella L. (1983). Transfer and expression of foreign genes in plants. PhD thesis. Laboratory of Genetics, Gent University, Belgium.

Higgings C.F., Hyde S.C., Mimmack M.M., Gileadi U., Gill D.R. and Gallagher M.P. (1990). Binding protein-dependent transport systems. Journal of Bioenergy and Biomembranes 22:571-592.

Hille J., Wullems G., Schilperoort R.A. (1983). Non-oncogenic T-region mutants of Agrobacterium tumefaciens do transfer T-DNA into plant cells. Plant Molecular Biology 2:155-163.

Hooykaas P.J.J. and Shilperoort R.A. (1992). Agrobacterium and plant genetic engineering. Plant Molecular Biology 19:15-38.

Huang Y., Morel P., Powell B. and Kado C.I. (1990). VirA, a coregulator of Ti-specified virulence genes, is phosphorylated in vitro. Journal of Bacteriology 172:1142-1144.

Iuchi S. (1993). Phosphorylation/dephosphorylation of the receiver module at the conserved aspartate residue controls transphosphorylation activity of histidine kinase in sensor protein ArcB of Escherichia coli. Journal of Biological Chemistry 268:23972-23980.

Jayaram, M (1994). Phosphoryl transfer if FLP recombination: a template for strand transfer mechanisms. Trends Biotechnology. 19:78-82.

Jeon G.A., Eum J.S. and Sim W.S. (1998). The role of inverted repeat (IR) sequence of the virE gene expression in Agrobacterium tumefaciens pTiA6. Molecules and Cells 8:49-53.

Jin S., Prusti R.K., Roitsch T., Ankenbauer R.G. and Nester E.W. (1990a). The VirG protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens is phosphorylated by the autophosphorylated VirA protein and this is essential for its biological activity. Journal of Bacteriology 172: 4945-4950.

Jin, S, T Roitisch, Christie P.J. and Nester E.W. (1990b). The regulatory VirG protein specifically binds to a cis acting regulatory sequence involved in transcriptional activation of Agrobacterium tumefaciens virulence genes. Journal of Bacteriology 172:531-562.

Jin S., Song Y., Pan S. and Nester E.W. (1993). Characterisation of a virG mutation that confers constitutive virulence gene expression in Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Molecular Microbiology 7:555-562.

Jones A.L., Lai E.M., Shirasu K. and Kado C.I. (1996). Vir B2 is a processed pilin-like protein encoded by the Agobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid. Journal of Bacteriology 178:5706-57112.

Kanemoto R.H., Powell A.T., Akiyoshi D.E., Regier D.A., Kerstetter R.A., Nester E.W., Hawes M.C. and Gordon M.P. (1989). Nucleotide sequence and analysis of the plant-inducible locus pinF from Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Journal of Bacteriology 171:2506-2512.

Koncz C., Németh K., Redei G.P. and Scell J. (1994). In: p. 167-189, Paszkowski J. (ed.). Homologous recombination and gene silencing in plants.

Kluwer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands.

Kuldau G.A., DeVos G., Owen J., McGaffrey G. and Zambryski P. (1990). The virB operon of Agrobacterium tumefaciens pTiC58 encodes 11 open reading frames. Molecular General Genetics 221:256-266.

Lehman C.W., Trautman J.K. and Carroll D. (1994). Illegitimate recombination in Xenopus: characterisation of end-joined junctions. Nucleic Acid Research 22:434-442.

Lessl M. and Lanka E. (1994). Common mechanisms in bacterial conjugation and Ti-mediated T-DNA transfer to plant cells. Cell 77:321-324.

Lessl M., Balzer D., Pansegrau W. and Lanka E. (1992). Sequence similarities between the RP4 Tra2 and the Ti VirB region strongly support the conjugation model for T-DNA transfer. Journal of Biological Chemistry 267:20471-20480.

Lörz H., Baker B. and Schell J. (1985). Gene transfer to cereal cells mediated by protoplast transformation. Molecular General Genetics 199:473-497.

Matthysse A.G. (1987). Characterisation of non-attaching mutants of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Journal of Bacteriology 169:313-323.

Matthysse A.G. (1983). Role of bacterial cellulose fibrils in Agrobacterium tumefaciens infection. Journal of Bacteriology 154:906-915.

Matthysse A.G. (1986). Initial interactions of Agrobacterium tumefaciens with plant host cells. Critical Reviews in Microbiology 13:281-307.

Matthysse A.G., Yarnall H.A. and Young N. (1996). Requirement for genes with homology to ABC transport system for attachment and virulence of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Journal of Bacteriology 178:5302-5308.

Nester E.W., Gordon M.P., Amasino R.M. and Yanofsky M.F. (1984). Crown gall: a molecular and physiological analysis. Annual Review of Plant Physiology 35:387-413.

Nixon B.T., Ronson C.W. and Ausubel F.M. (1986). Two-component regulatory systems responsive to environmental stimuli share strongly conserved domains with the nitrogen assimilation regulatory genes ntrB and ntrC. Proceedings of National Academy of Sciences of the USA 83:7850-7854.

Oger P., Kim K.S., Sackett S.L., Piper K.R. and Farrand S.K. (1998). Octopine-type Ti plasmids code for mannopine-inducible dominant-negative allele of TraR, the quorum-sensing activator that regulates Ti plasmid conjugal transfer. Molecular Microbiology 27:277-288.

Okamoto S., Toyoda-Yamamoto A., Ito K., Takebe I. and Machida Y. (1991). Localisation and orientation of the VirD4 protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens in cell membrane. Molecular General Genetics 228:24-32.

Pan S.Q., Charles T., Jin S., Wu Z.L. and Nester E.W. (1993). Pre-formed dimeric state of the sensor protein VirA is involved in plant-Agrobacterium signal transduction. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 90:9939-9943.

Parkinson J.S. (1993). Signal transduction schemes of bacteria. Cell 73:857-871.

Peralta E.G., Ream L.W. (1985). T-DNA border sequence required for crown gall tumorigenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 82:5112-5116.

Piers K.L., Heath J.D., Liang X., Stephens K.M. and Nester E.W. (1996). Agrobacterium tumefaciens-mediated transformation of yeast. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 93:1613-1618.

Pohlman R.F., Genetti H.D. and Winans S.C. (1994). Common ancestry between IncN conjugal transfer genes and macromolecular export systems of plant and animal pathogens. Molecular Microbiology 14:655-668.

Potrykus I. (1991). Gene transfer to plants: Assessment of published approaches and results. Annual Review of Plant Physiology and Plant Molecular Biology 42:205-225.

Puchta H. (1998). Repair of genomic double-strand breaks in somatic cells by one-side invasion of homologous sequences. Plant Journal 13:331-339.

Rashkova S., Spudlich G.M. and Christie P.J. (1997). Characterisation of membrane and protein interaction determinants of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB11 ATPase. Journal of Bacteriology 179:583-591.

Rogowsky P.M., Powell B.S., Shirasu K., Lim T.S., Morel P., Zyprian E.M., Steck T.R. and Kado C.I. (1990). Molecular characterisation of the vir regulon of Agrobacterium tumefaciens: complete nucleotide sequence and gene organisation of the 28.63 kbp regulon cloned as single unit. Plasmid 23:85-106.

Rossi L., Hohn B. and Tinland B. (1993). Vir D2 protein carries nuclear localisation signals important to transfer of T-DNA to plants. Molecular General Genetics 239:345-353.

Sanford J. (1988). The biolistic process. Trends in Biotechnology 6:299-302.

Seligman L. and Manoil C. (1994). An amphipathic sequence determinant of membrane protein topology. Journal of Biological Chemistry 269:19888-19896.

Shillito R., Saul M., Paszkowski J., Muller M. and Potrykus I. (1985). High-efficiency direct transfer to plants. Biotechnology 3:1099-1103.

Shimoda N., Toyoda-Yamamoto A., Nagamine J., Usami S., Katayama M., Sakagami Y. and Machida Y. (1990a). Control of expression of Agrobacterium tumefaciens genes by synergistic actions of phenolic signal molecules and monosaccharides. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 87:6684-6688.

Shimoda N., Toyoda-Yamamoto A., Aoki S. and Machida Y. (1990b). Genetic evidence for an interaction between the VirA sensor protein and the ChvE sugar binding protein of Agrobacterium tumefaciens. Journal of Biological Chemistry 268:26552-26558.

Shirasu K. and Kado C.I. (1993a). The virB operon of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens virulence regulon has sequence similarities to B,C, and D open reading frames downstream of the Pertussis toxin-operon and to the DNA transfer-operons of broad-host-range conjugative plasmids. Nucleic Acid Research 21:353-354.

Shirasu K. and Kado C.I. (1993b). Membrane location of the Ti plasmid VirB proteins involved in the biosynthesis of a pilin-like conjugative structure on Agrobacterium tumefaciens. FEMS Microbiology Letters 111:287-294.

Shirasu K., Morel P. and Kado C.I. (1990). Characterisation of the virB operon of an Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid: nucleotide sequence and protein analysis. Molecular Microbiology 4:1153-1163.

Shirasu K., Koukolikova-Nicola Z., Hohn B. and Kado C.I. (1994) An inner-membrane-associated virulence protein essential for T-DNA transfer from Agrobacterium tumefacien to plants exhibits ATPase activity and similarities to conjugative transfer genes. Molecular Microbiology 11:581-588.

Shurvinton C.E., Hodges L. and Ream W. (1992). A nuclear localisation signal and the C-terminal omega sequence in the Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirD2 endonuclease are important for tumour formation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 89:11837-11841.

Smith E.F. and Towsend C.O. (1907). A plant tumour of bacterial origin. Science 25:671-673.

Spudich G.M., Fernandez D., Zhou X.R. and Christie P.J. (1996). Intermolecular disulfide bonds stabilise VirB7 homodimmers and VirB7/VirB9 heterodimmers during biogenesis of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens T-complex transport apparatus. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 93:7512-7517.

Stephens K.M., Roush C. and Nester E.W. (1995). Agrobacterium tumefaciens VirB11 protein requires a consensus nucleotide-binding site for function in virulence. Journal of Bacteriology 177:27-36.

Sundberg C., Meek L., Carroll K., Das A. and Ream W. (1996). VirE1 protein mediates export of the single-stranded DNA binding protein VirE2 from Agrobacterium tumefaciens into plant cells. Journal of Bacteriology 178:1207-1212.

Thomashow M.F., Karlinsey J.E., Marks J.R. and Hurlbert R.E. (1987). Identification of a new virulence locus in Agrobacterium tumefaciens that affects polysaccharide composition and plant attachment. Journal of Bacteriology 169:3209-3216.

Thompson D.V., Melchers L.S., Idler K.B., Schilperoort R.A. and Hooykaas P.J.J. (1988). Analysis of the complete nucleotide sequence of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens virB operon. Nucleic Acids Research 16:4621-4636.

Tinland B., Schoumacher F., Gloeckler V., Bravo Angel A.M. and Hohn B. (1995). The Agrobacterium tumefaciens virulence D2 protein is responsible for precise integration of T-DNA into the plant genome. EMBO Journal 14:3585-3595.

Torisky R.S., Kovacs L., Avdiushko S., Newman J.D., Hunt A.G., and Collins G.B. (1997). Development of a binary vector system for plant transformation based on supervirulent Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain Chry5. Plant Cell Reports 17:102-108.

Toro N., Datta A., Carmi O.A., Young C., Prusti R.K. and Nester E.W. (1989) The Agrobacterium tumefaciens virC1 gene products binds to overdrive, a T-DNA transfer enhancer. Journal of Bacteriology 171:6845-6849.

Turk S.C.H.J., van Lange R.P., Sonneveld E. and Hooykaas P.J.J. (1993). The chimeric VirA-Tar receptor protein is locked into highly responsive state. Journal of Bacteriology 175:5706-5709.

Uchimiya H., Fushimi T., Hashimoto H., Harada H., Syono K.and Sugawara Y. (1986). Expression of a foreign gene in callus derived from DNA-treated protoplasts of rice (Oryza sativa L.). Molecular General Genetics 204:204-207.

Van Haaren M.J.J., Pronk J.T., Schilperoort R.A. and Hooykaas P.J.J. (1987). Functional analysis of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens octopine Ti-plasmid left and right T-Region border fragments. Plant Molecular Biology 8:95-104.

Ward J.E., Akiyoshi D.E., Regier D., Datta A., Gordon N.P. and Nester E.W. (1988). Characterisation of the virB operon from an Agrobacterium tumefaciens Ti plasmid. Journal of Biological Chemistry 265:4768.

Whatley M.H. and Spress L.D. (1977). Role of bacterial lipopolysaccharide in attachment of Agrobacterium to moss. Plant Physiology 60:765-766.

Winans S.C. (1992). Two-way chemical signalling in Agrobacterium-plant interactions. Microbiology Reviews 56:12-31.

Zhou X.R. and Christie P.J. (1997). Suppression of mutant phenotypes of the Agrobacterium tumefaciens VcirB11 ATPase by overproduction of VirB proteins. Journal of Bacteriology 179:5835-5842.

Zupan J.R. and Zambryski P.C. (1995). Transfer of T-DNA from Agrobacterium to the plant cell. Plant Physiology 107:1041.1047.

Zupan J.R., Citovsky V. and Zambryski P.C. (1996). Agrobacterium VirE2 protein mediates nuclear uptake of single-stranded DNA in plant cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA 93:2392-2397.

Supported by UNESCO / MIRCEN network
Home | Mail to Editor | Search | Archive