Electronic Journal of Biotechnology ISSN: 0717-3458
  © 2008 by Universidad Católica de Valparaíso -- Chile
Vol. 11 No. 3, Issue of July 15, 2008
 

Table 5. Training versus test sets: validation results.


SAR model

Training

Test

Intercept

ASMmVQt

lfDdOQg

InMrLQg

LsDMpQg

ntr

r2tr

Ftr (p)

nts

r2ts

Fts (p)

-3.432

0.035

-0.341

0.087

-0.379

18

0.968

98 (1.4·10-9)

12

0.980

74.92 (7.9·10-6)

-3.300

0.034

-0.329

0.082

-0.352

19

0.975

139 (4.3·10-11)

11

0.971

49.59 (9.9·10-5)

-3.253

0.035

-0.321

0.075

-0.326

20

0.972

132 (1.7·10-11)

10

0.974

43.28 (4.5·10-4)

-3.175

0.034

-0.310

0.065

-0.328

21

0.986

275 (1.6·10-14)

9

0.941

13.14 (1.4·10-2)

-3.206

0.034

-0.320

0.078

-0.314

22

0.954

89 (3.7·10-11)

8

0.994

114.7 (1.3·10-3)

   

 

0.971

μ

0.972

0.011

StdDev

0.019

ntr = number of compounds in training set; r2tr = squared correlation coefficient of training set; Ftr = Fisher parameter of training set; nts = number of compounds of test set; r2ts = squared correlation coefficient of test set; Fts = Fisher parameter of test set; μ = arithmetic mean; StdDev = standard deviation; p = type I error.

  Supported by UNESCO / MIRCEN network